REPORT TIERS
Every Inventiply report is produced by the same AI-augmented system, designed and curated by people who have invented, litigated, monetized, and exited. The free Tier 1 tells you whether the work is worth doing. Each tier above it answers a more specific question — and each fee credits toward the next tier when you upgrade within 90 days.
Inventiply reports are decision-support analysis, not legal advice or legal opinions. Formal legal work is performed by DeepLaw LLP or your own counsel.
Inventiply’s founders took note of the many scoring and ‘answer’ tools available to IP practitioners (and, more rarely, inventors and investors) and committed to showing their work. In Inventiply’s reports, there is no analysis or scoring to take on faith. Every report shows its evidence and its reasoning — testable, checkable, cited — so you, your counsel, your investors, and your experts can draw your own conclusions from the same file we did.
Each tier answers a more expensive question than the one below it, and each credits toward the next when you upgrade within 90 days.
Inventiply reports are decision-support analysis, not legal advice or legal opinions. Formal legal work is performed by DeepLaw LLP or your own counsel.
ADDS: THE HONEST READ — PROCEED OR PAUSE
Is this worth looking at further? In a few business days, you’ll have an honest read on whether your invention has protectable leverage, whether someone may already be copying it, and whether the idea opens into something bigger. Free. No call required.
ADDS: ONE NAMED RISK OR OPPORTUNITY
“Where is the first real risk or opportunity?”
One named company or product. A plain-English explanation of why it matters. A preliminary classification of whether the risk or opportunity is worth pursuing — with a short checklist of what to confirm next.
ADDS: VALUATION BAND + FIRST NAMED TARGETS
“Can this support investor interest or an acquisition?”
An investor-usable report. Valuation range by route (sale, license, enforcement, defensive acquisition). Three to five named likely targets. One representative claim-chart excerpt. Top diligence risks. A one-page plain-English executive summary at the front.
| Model | Most-likely value | Floor | Ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | $11.3 million | $1.9 million | $28.0 million |
| Middle | $32.0 million | $2.4 million | $65.0 million |
| Aggressive | $88.0 million | $28.0 million | $340.0 million |
ADDS: CLAIM CHARTS + RANKED TARGET LIST
“Should the buyer proceed, and where first?”
Ranked top 10–15 targets with reasons. Four to eight selected claim charts for the strongest products. Route-specific valuation and recommended diligence order. High-level enforcement framework. Top diligence items and mistakes to avoid.
| Claim language (verbatim) | Public documentation |
|---|---|
| “determine that the first image data does not include a face of a user;” | The recognition pipeline performs facial detection before recognition, distinguishing frames with no enrolled face.amazon.science/blog/the-science-behind-visual-id |
| “determine a user identifier that uniquely identifies the user from a plurality of users associated with the device...” | The device matches the in-view face against the enrolled set — up to 10 members per device.amazon.com/gp/help — Visual ID |
| “cause the content item to be presented on the display of the device.” | “When Alexa recognizes you, the device shows content from your Alexa profile.”amazon.com/gp/help — Visual ID |
ADDS: THE ACTION PLAN — WHOM, IN WHAT ORDER, WHAT TO SAY
“What exactly should be done, in what order, with whom, and why?”
Self-contained from cold. Full prioritized target universe. Full preliminary claim-chart appendix (public-source). Teardown priorities. Route-specific valuation and action sequence. Target-by-target litigation posture and likely defenses. Decision gates and mistakes to avoid.
ADDS: THE COMPLETE FILE A CAMPAIGN RUNS ON
“Is this ready for buyers, funders, counsel, or execution?”
Everything in the Action Plan, plus an expanded claim-chart appendix, board/IC summary, funder-readiness framing, strategy session, and transaction-readiness memo. This is the highest report tier — and the starting point for a monetization campaign.
When you upgrade within 90 days, the prior-tier fee is credited against the higher-tier cost. The net cash outlay at upgrade is materially lower than the gross figure.
Execution support is scoped separately. Qualified monetization engagements may be structured with fixed fees, retainers, or success-aligned terms.
INVENTORS & FOUNDERS
Start with the free Proceed or Pause Review. It tells you whether you have protectable leverage and what the next move is — file a provisional, broaden first, validate the market, or wait. From there, Tier 2 names your first concrete risk or opportunity, and Tier 3 produces a report you can put in front of an investor.
Most founders never need the upper tiers. We will tell you when you do not.
PATENT OWNERS & INVESTORS
If you hold issued patents or are evaluating someone else’s, start with a Patent Portfolio First-Look Review — the portfolio form of the Tier 1 screen. It establishes which rights are alive, which are dead, where value may sit, and whether deeper diligence is justified.
From there the ladder runs through valuation, ranked targets, claim charts, and a monetization action plan, up to the master file from which a campaign is run.
ADD-ONS
Add-ons are scoped consulting engagements, quoted in writing like the upper tiers. Where an add-on involves legal analysis, that work is performed by DeepLaw LLP — or by your own counsel, working collaboratively with Inventiply — under a separate engagement.
$7,500 – $25,000
Official register checks, ownership, assignments, liens, expiration, and sale authority. Flags defects before you buy or assert — for counsel’s confirmation.
$5,000 – $15,000
For software-method, business-method, or AI portfolios: eligibility risk mapping under current USPTO guidance, prepared for counsel’s use.
$15,000 – $50,000
Search and analysis for anticipation and obviousness risks. Search and organization by Inventiply; validity conclusions through DeepLaw LLP or your own counsel.
$15,000 – $50,000We collect and organize the collaboration, supply, grant, and standards relationships that can create defenses, so counsel can read them fast. May surface the facts that clear or kill the most valuable targets. (Legal conclusions through DeepLaw LLP or your own counsel.)
$5,000 – $25,000
Structured interviews with former founders, inventors, or technical leads who know facts public sources cannot reach.
$10,000 – $35,000 + costs
Prioritizes which products to buy, open, test, and measure. Directs diligence money to the highest-value proof gaps.
No. You enter where your situation fits and stop when you have what you need. Each tier is a complete, useful product on its own. We will tell you when you do not need to go further.
Yes, when you upgrade within 90 days. The credit applies to the gross fee of the next tier, so the net cash outlay at the upgrade point is materially lower than the gross figure. Current credit terms are shown per tier.
Yes. Tier 4 and above usually begin with a short scoping conversation so the report fits the asset — portfolio size, jurisdictions, and the proof required affect the scope and cost.
Advanced portfolio, enforcement, and investor-diligence reports may include target ranking, multiple claim charts, valuation by route, proof-gap analysis, and a full monetization strategy. The work is priced to the value of the analysis, not to the number of pages.
No — and be wary of anyone who promises that. Public evidence has limits: patent applications stay unpublished for eighteen months, and some proof exists only behind a teardown or discovery. What we promise instead is that every finding is cited to its source and every gap is named. That is what makes the findings you do get worth acting on.
An honest read on whether your invention has protectable leverage, whether similar ground is already claimed, whether someone may already be using your IP without a license, and whether there are opportunities to broaden. No call required.
Inventiply reports are decision-support analysis, not legal advice or legal opinions. Formal legal work is performed by DeepLaw LLP or your own counsel.