PROFESSIONAL EDITION
For IP Practitioners

The intelligence your practice needs — before you advise, file, or commit.

Inventiply gives IP professionals the data to counsel with confidence. Whether you’re helping a client decide whether to prosecute, helping a buyer assess a portfolio, or preparing for litigation — start with what the landscape actually looks like. We are not another platform to learn or a seat to license. Send the matter; get the finished file; bill your judgment on top of it.

For Patent Professionals

Help clients understand the landscape before they commit to prosecution.

Patent prosecutors and agents use Inventiply to give clients a ground-floor view of the competitive patent landscape before filing. Our reports surface who owns what, what’s been filed recently, and where the whitespace is — so your client walks into prosecution with realistic expectations and a defensible strategy.

IDEAL FORSupporting your freedom-to-operate counseling, pre-prosecution landscape analysis, landscape input to your clearance work, and client education before major prosecution spend.

See a sample report (Google patent)
For IP Brokers & Litigators

Know what a portfolio is worth before you commit.

IP brokers, transactional attorneys, and litigation funders use Inventiply’s pre-commitment analysis to cut through surface-level patent counts and understand actual portfolio strength. Who’s already using these patents? What’s the enforcement history? Where does the real value sit?

IDEAL FORPortfolio acquisitions, licensing program launches, NPE strategy development, and litigation funding due diligence.

Request a pre-commitment analysis →
FIG. 1

The charts you’ll actually receive.

A claim chart puts each requirement of the claim next to the public evidence that a product does it — this is what lands on your desk, not a black-box score.

CHART 1 — AMAZON ECHO SHOW (VISUAL ID) v. US10992986 CL. 1FROM THE PUBLIC SAMPLE
Claim language (verbatim)Public documentation
“determine that the first image data does not include a face of a user;”The recognition pipeline performs facial detection before recognition, distinguishing frames with no enrolled face. “The system... first has to detect that a face is present (facial detection) and then determine whose face it is (facial recognition).”amazon.science/blog/the-science-behind-visual-id
“determine a user identifier that uniquely identifies the user from a plurality of users associated with the device...”The device matches the in-view face against the enrolled set — up to 10 members per device — selecting the specific individual. “Visual ID can be set up for up to 10 people per device.”amazon.com/gp/help — Visual ID
“cause the content item to be presented on the display of the device.”“When Alexa recognizes you, the device shows content from your Alexa profile, such as your calendar, reminders, and recently played music.”amazon.com/gp/help — Visual ID
LIKELY INFRINGER — STRONG PUBLIC EVIDENCE“Every element of the charted claim is supported by the public documentation cited above.”
NAMING A PRODUCT IS AN UNVERIFIED, ILLUSTRATIVE HYPOTHESIS — NOT AN ACCUSATION
The IP Opportunity Map

The IP Opportunity Map turns your clients into your next engagements.

Every patent practitioner has them — clients sitting on an invention, an issued patent, or a portfolio that keeps raising the same questions and never quite turns into work. Inventiply’s IP Opportunity Map clears the murk without the prohibitive cost. Submit one matter and receive a structured strategic analysis that shows you and your client exactly where the value and the action are.

Broadening opportunities

Where the invention opens into claims worth pursuing beyond what was filed.

Specification mining

Unclaimed material in the specification that reads on actively infringed products and services.

Validity scoring

Scoring of potential claims — without human knowledge of materials that must go in an information disclosure statement (IDS).

Potential unlicensed use

Possible infringement and enforcement leads already in the market.

Potential licensees & acquirers

Who would pay to use the invention — named, not hypothesized.

Portfolio priorities

Which assets justify deeper review, and which don’t.

Evidence gaps

What still has to be proven, stated plainly — the gaps that will shape strategy.

Recommended workstreams

The specific legal engagements worth recommending next — your engagements.

The result is a client who arrives at your office with clear priorities and sharper questions — and a matter that’s ready to move. The Map sends better matters to your desk — and helps the weak ones reveal themselves before anyone burns time and client money.

The IP Opportunity Map: $1,500 per matter.

Inventiply reports are analytics in support of your professional judgment — not legal opinions, and never a step between you and your client.

See a sample report (Google patent)

See the maintenance-fee case study →

FIG. 2

Labels that say how strong the evidence actually is.

Every named product carries one of four proof-state labels. None asserts infringement; each tells you what the public record shows and what the next step costs.

PROOF-STATE LABELS USED IN EVERY REPORTFROM THE PUBLIC SAMPLE
Likely infringer — strong public evidence

Public sources describe the product doing each item on the patent claim’s checklist. The strongest the public record gets.

Likely infringer — one proof gap

Public sources show the main feature, but one step on the checklist still needs confirmation by teardown, testing, manuals, or discovery.

Possible infringer — early lead

The right technical area, but the record is not yet enough to say more. Worth pursuing, not yet worth charting as a match.

Set aside for now

A required fact is missing, contradicted by the vendor, or the product predates the patent — treated as prior art, not a candidate.

THESE DESCRIBE THE STATE OF THE EVIDENCE, NOT A LEGAL CONCLUSION

Ready to work smarter on your next matter?

Request a sample report or reach out to discuss how Inventiply fits your practice.